Electrostatic Repulsion Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography — A New Tool for Enrichment of Phospho- and Glycopeptides
Tim Wehr
Introduction of modifications into the protein backbone or its amino acid side chains following the translation of the mRNA
code enables a single polypeptide chain to be transformed into diverse species with enhanced or modified biological functions.
These posttranslational modifications (PTMs) can affect the cellular location of a protein, its biological lifetime, and its
function or activity level. Of the huge variety of PTMs observed in the proteome, phosphorylation and glycosylation are among
the most important. Reversible phosphorylation at serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues is implicated in control of cell
growth and differentiation, cell death, gene expression, and signal transduction. Glycosylation at serine, threonine, and
asparagine residues modulates the structure and function of membrane and secreted proteins and is important in proper protein
folding and subcellular localization. Given the importance of these two posttranslational modifications in cell metabolism,
the characterization of phosphoprotein and glycoprotein structure and function is vital to the identification of drug targets
and development of novel therapeutics.
Posttranslationally modified sites in proteins are identified generally by digestion of the protein and identification of
its constituent peptides. The low abundance of a particular posttranslationally modified species is a major impediment to
its characterization in a complex mixture such as a body fluid or cell lysate. To obtain sufficient material for study and
to eliminate the vast majority of interfering proteins, selective enrichment techniques are required. Enrichment can be performed
at the protein level, or, more commonly, at the peptide level after enzymatic cleavage of the protein. Enrichment techniques
for glycoproteins include lectin chromatography (1–3), size exclusion chromatography (4), hydrazide-based covalent coupling
(5), and (in the case of sialic acid–containing glycopeptides) cation-exchange chromatography (6). Enrichment techniques for
phosphoproteins and phosphopeptides were reviewed in the June issue of "Directions in Discovery" (7). These include immunoprecipitation
(8,9), chemical modification by β-elimination (10) or using phosphoramidate chemistry (11), immobilized metal affinity chromatography
(IMAC) (12), and enrichment on metal oxides such as titanium dioxide (13) or zirconium dioxide (14). Currently, IMAC or metal
oxides are the most popular methods for enrichment of phosphopeptides.
The available enrichment techniques for phosphopeptides have two limitations. First, they tend to yield phosphopeptides as
a class, with little or no discrimination among peptides differing in the level of phosphorylation. Second, no single enrichment
technique delivers the entire phosphoproteome. A comparative study of phosphoramidate chemistry, IMAC, and TiO2 enrichment (15) demonstrated that overlap of the three techniques was poor, suggesting that each technique isolates a different
subset of the phosphoproteome. The study of proteomics would benefit from a technique that would resolve phosphopeptides with
different levels of phosphorylation and that would provide better (or complementary) representation of the phosphoproteome.
Recently, electrostatic repulsion–hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) has emerged as a candidate technique. ERLIC
is a variation of hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) that shows promise for separation and enrichment of phosphopeptides
(16) and glycopeptides (17).