 John W. Dolan
|
The topics for this month's "LC Troubleshooting" column come from the attendees of some of the method-development and troubleshooting
classes that I have taught recently. One of these problems involves a liquid chromatography (LC) method in which an occasional
sample gives a peak that is too small. The second case is one in which the analyte peak appears when a drug-free placebo sample
is run. Although the topics are interesting in themselves, they also provide practical examples of the application of some
of the general troubleshooting techniques discussed in last month's "LC Troubleshooting" (1).
Too Little
The first case involves a method for the analysis of a drug extracted from a tablet. After running the system-suitability
test, a duplicate injection of the reference standard is made. Then five samples are run, each injected in duplicate. The
sequence of two standard injections and ten sample injections is continued, until all the samples are analyzed, ending with
duplicate injections of the standard. The problem is that occasionally — perhaps 1 sample in 20 — one of the sample injections
has an area that is several percent lower than its duplicate, exceeding the allowed variability of the method. When the sample
is reinjected in duplicate, invariably both results match the larger of the two previous attempts at analysis. The question
is what has caused this and what corrective action can be taken.
The cause and solution are not immediately obvious to me, but there are several possible causes, and some additional experiments
might help to clarify the source. I suspect that the odd injection is the result of injecting a smaller volume of sample,
so my isolation experiments would focus on that. Blocked needle: Is a piece of the vial septum partially blocking the sample needle now and then? Some septum types can be more susceptible
to "coring" than others. One popular type of septum has a PTFE film on the bottom and a polymer seal on top. If the needle
cuts a piece of the seal out, it could be drawn into the needle and cause problems. A change to a presplit septum or simply
a PTFE-film septum might be a solution if this were the problem. Sometimes damage to the sample needle will cause the tip
to get roughened or sharp so that it cuts the septum instead of tearing or puncturing it; a needle replacement should eliminate
this as a problem source.
Particulate matter in the sample could cause problems similar to drawing a piece of septum into the sample needle. Inspect
the sample for particulates to see if this could be a problem. Each sample could be filtered or centrifuged before injection
to ensure that no suspended particles remain. Other sources of particulate matter are the mobile phase (not likely) or particles
released from worn pump seals. If either of these is suspected, correct the problem at its source. Addition of a 0.5-ľm porosity
in-line filter just upstream from the autosampler also would serve to trap any particles from the pump or mobile phase before
they caused problems in the autosampler.
Bubbles: If a bubble were drawn into the needle instead of or along with sample, the sample volume would be low, giving results consistent
with those observed. I would make sure that the needle and connecting tubing to the syringe mechanism was thoroughly purged
and did not contain bubbles. Most autosamplers have an adjustable syringe speed to accommodate viscous samples. With viscous
samples, a fill rate that is too fast can create bubbles in the syringe, which will compromise precision. If excessive sample
viscosity is observed and this is suspected, a change in the syringe fill rate might help.