In the 1950s, petroleum-related gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) applications were one of the founding cornerstones
of modern MS. Even now, "petroleomics" — not to be outdone by life science research — serves as an example of the cutting
edge in liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) (1). In petroleomics, high order MS techniques can differentiate between
chemical species that differ by less than the mass of a single electron. Such astonishing precision has come about as the
magnetic-sector mass spectrometers of previous decades have yielded their place to modern, time-of-flight mass spectrometers,
improving the utility and flexibility of analyses with high mass accuracy and resolution.
The Time has Arrived
War in the middle east and Asia exacerbates fuel and heating oil shortages in the United States, heralding the end of an era
of inexpensive oil. The stock market (with the exception of oil stocks) stumbles badly, and following the president's authorization
of controls on oil prices, production, and allocation, the secretary of state announces a national plan to make the country
"energy independent." You could be forgiven for assuming that, except for the last two items, I am recounting news of 2008.
Yet the United States' president was Richard Nixon, and it was during his tenure in the early 1970s that oil prices went from
slightly more than $3 a barrel to nearly $12. Later in that decade, the country faced a resurgence of energy-related issues.
As the decades passed the United States' national energy policy is still a work-in-progress.
Because it requires little cultural adaptation on the part of us humans, blending novel power-generating technologies with
renewable energy sources would seem more promising of success. But even here, besides the considerable technological hurdles
involved in developing alternative energy supplies, those who promote change encounter cultural resistance. Among the nontechnology
issues that plague us are lawsuits brought by abutters who find wind machines problematic for aesthetic and other reasons,
interest groups for whose members abandoning the status quo would cost money, the relatively high cost of the new technologies,
and geographical restrictions on wind, thermal, or solar generation of electricity on any useful scale. Wave farms for instance,
planned for the coast of the state of Rhode Island (Oceanlinx, Australia), would consist of 10–14 floating cable-tethered
units each unit 90 ft long, 60 ft wide reaching a height of 30 ft above sea level.
Figure 1: Commonly used plant species in the United States are viable for widespread growth. (Figure courtesy of Russ Miller
at ORNL from Bioenergy Feedstock Development Program Status Report, ORNL/TM-2000/92, Model woody and herbaceous crops chosen
for study in the 1990s.)
In December 2008, 120 windmills — the largest of Europe's onshore facilities — went online in Portugal. The total output is
650 GW hours per year, or 1% of the country's total energy needs — enough to provide power to about 300,000 homes (2). A relatively
poor country by Western European standards, Portugal is already recognized for its unique, commercial wave-power plant, though
the plant has been, so far, slow in meeting expectations (3).
To date, the world's largest onshore wind farm, the Horse Hollow Wind Energy Center, is located in the United States, in Texas,
and it provides more than 700 MW (4). Portugal is less than one-fifth the size of Texas, and its population, less than half
that of Texas (10.6 million versus 23.5 million) is far more dense. Its goal of achieving more than 30% of its power generated
by new technologies by 2020 is commendable (according to the Guardian article cited here, that figure is more than twice the
amount planned for the U.K.). Nevertheless, the cost of new projects is substantial, and it looms as a frequent issue in technology
development discussions. In this instance, the Portuguese government supplies subsidies up to 40% of costs.