 Ronald E. Majors
|
Recently, efforts have been devoted to the miniaturization of existing liquid–liquid extraction methods to make them more
versatile and powerful. Reducing the use of hazardous organic solvents due to environmental and cost concerns, time reduction,
ease of automation, possible online coupling, high-throughput capability, and the small amounts of matrix available are major
incentives that have motivated scientists working towards miniaturization. In bioanalysis, which in this context is defined
as the analysis of small drug molecules and their metabolites in biological samples, the complexity of the matrices requires
selective and specific sample preparation methods to isolate the analytes of interest. Macromolecules, salts, cellular material,
fat, or lipids in biological matrices such as urine, plasma, whole blood, and breast milk can disturb the separation and data
analysis steps. In addition, the analytes of interest can often exist in low concentrations (pg/mL–ľg/mL). Therefore, a sample
preparation method with high degree of selectivity and enrichment is crucial for a successful analysis.
With these considerations kept in mind, a totally new approach to sample preparation was proposed in 2006 (1). The innovative
concept, called electromembrane extraction (EME), combined the technical setup for hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction
(HF-LPME) (2,3) with known principles for electroextraction (4–10). This combination offers a highly selective sample preparation
method using simple equipment and gains a high degree of enrichment within a short period of time.
The EME method extracts charged substances from a small sample volume through a thin membrane of organic solvent immobilized
in the wall of a hollow fiber and into a receiver solution inside the lumen of the hollow fiber. This extraction process is
forced by an applied potential difference across the membrane, and this combination of well-known liquid–liquid extraction
processes with electrokinetic migration yields a rapid and selective sample preparation method for ionic substances. EME has
shown to be compatible with a wide range of biological matrices — for example, plasma, whole blood, urine, and breast milk
— preparing clean extracts in a short period of time with simple and inexpensive equipment.
 Figure 1
|
This installment of "Sample Prep Perspectives" is a minireview of the EME technique and shows the investigation of several
parameters that affect recovery of charged analytes. In addition, a number of application examples will illustrate its potential
for the successful extraction of drugs from complex matrices.
Experimental
The technical setup for the equipment used in EME is based upon earlier experience with HF-LPME and is shown in Figure 1a.
The hollow fiber used is made of porous polypropylene, which is compatible with a broad range of organic solvents. The thickness
of the wall of the hollow fiber is 200 ľm, with a pore size of 0.2 ľm and an internal diameter of 1.2 mm. A piece of the hollow
fiber is cut to a length of 25 mm and mechanically closed at the lower end with a pair of pincers. The upper end is sealed
to the end of a 22-mm pipette tip by heating. To make the supported liquid membrane (SLM), the fiber is dipped in an organic
solvent for 5 s to fill the pores in the walls, and the excess of organic solvent gently removed with a medical wipe.
The fiber connected to the pipette tip is guided through a punched hole in the sample compartment cap as illustrated in Figure
1a. The pipette tip works as a mechanical support for a 0.5-mm-thick platinum wire placed inside the lumen of the hollow fiber.
Another platinum wire is introduced directly into the donor phase through the sample compartment cap. When coupled to a power
supply, these inert wires act as electrodes, thus creating an electrical field across the SLM. In this way, the equipment
makes a closed electrical circuit, where the SLM functions as a resistor.
The volume of the sample varies between 150 ľL and 500 ľL, depending upon the sample compartment size. However, the compartment
is never filled more than half full because of the need for convection space. The sample is shaken on a platform shaker during
the extraction to increase the physical movement of the analytes in the bulk donor phase and to reduce the thickness of the
stagnant layer at the interface between the donor phase and the SLM. The acceptor phase volume is set to 25 ľL and is introduced
into the lumen of the hollow fiber by a microsyringe. When the predetermined extraction period is finished, 20 ľL of the acceptor
phase is collected by the microsyringe and transferred to a vial for analysis in a capillary electrophoresis (CE) instrument
(11–15) or by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (16).