Choosing and effectively employing analytical technology is the broader discussion that underlies the diversity of topics
that appear in this installment of "MS—The Practical Art." Over the last five years, we have presented the reasoning of the
practitioners we consult, to disseminate their wisdom and further our own knowledge in a number of areas such as accurate
mass measurement, sample preparation, modern small-particle ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography (UHPLC) technology, and
evaluating the viability of emerging non-LC ionization prospects.
In almost every instance, I relied on the expertise of well-recognized practitioners, not only for their "nuts-and-bolts"
explanations but for the unique insight their experience affords. Insights developed from their well-earned knowledge we cannot
glean from reading peer-reviewed work.
This month, Drs. Kind and Fiehn discuss small-molecule structure elucidation (excluding peptides) using hyphenated chromatographic
techniques, mass spectrometers, and other spectroscopic detectors. Their opinions help us glimpse the hardware and software
challenges that we face in the near future.
The World Outside Analytical Chemistry Fails to Recognize the Myriad and Difficult Intellectual Challenges That Attend the
Structure Elucidation of Small MoleculesIn the last 20 years, no major discussion of large-scale efforts on the structure elucidation of small molecules has found
its way into high-impact journals like Science and Nature. Innovative, breakthrough technologies like comprehensive gas chromatography (GC) (GC×GC), Orbitrap mass spectrometry (MS)
from Thermo Fisher Scientific (San Jose, California), DART ionization from JEOL (Peabody, Massachusetts), and UHPLC separations
developed from Waters Corporation (UPLC, Milford, Massachusetts) appeared largely in method-oriented journals. Yet high-impact
journals targeting broad readerships frequently showcase techniques like gene sequencing and expression, which are relatively
mature. Why? Results obtained by genomic analysis can be linked directly to biological activity, gene names, and protein structures
and their functions. Because they can deliver results that answer biological questions, such techniques attract major research
interest.
There is also the problem of difficulty. Structure elucidation of small molecules using only hyphenated techniques like GC–MS
and LC–MS without nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is extremely difficult to perform. The failure 40 years ago
of the Dendral project (1) is an apt example. In that project, scientists pioneered computer-assisted structure elucidation
(CASE) techniques. In doing so, they laid the foundation for most of the subsequent research in the field. Yet since then,
no similar project has attracted funding, this despite the increasing sophistication of software technology and computer design.
Hyphenated Chromatographic Techniques Deliver Multidimensional data
Let us first address the pure chromatographic technologies: orthogonal techniques like LC×LC, GC×GC, ultraperformance techniques
like UHPLC, new separation principles, and new phases like monolithic capillary phases, hydrophilic interaction, and aqueous
normal-phase chromatography. Unfortunately, those separation techniques cannot solve all of our current problems regarding
structure elucidation of small molecules. Nevertheless, we must use them in conjunction with spectroscopic and MS detectors
to separate complex mixtures and, finally, to obtain the true isomer structures of molecules.
We can say the same for pure MS technologies: that ultrahigh resolving power, high mass accuracy, and high isotopic abundance
accuracy alone cannot solve all our structure elucidation problems. Only together with chromatographic separations do they
unfold their power. The process of structure elucidation requires use of all dimensions of acquired multidimensional data.
Running a GC–MS analysis on the basis of a mass spectral library search only without retention-index information is not the
best approach to confirming identity when an added informational dimension is easily available. Nor is acquiring LC–MS chromatograms
and neglecting MSn and MSe information because it lacks software concepts. MSe is the practice of using high and low collision energies to enhance the spectral quality of an analyte in MS-MS while MSn is a technique popularized in ion traps of successively fragmenting ions which are themselves products of a fragmentation
experiment to enhance spectral quality.