The launch of porous sub-2 μm particle stationary phases, combined with the simultaneous commercialization of compatible chromatographic
instruments for these column geometries,1,2 has increased the amount of liquid chromatography (LC) development, particularly in the field of high-throughput separations.
Because chromatographic efficiency and mobile phase flow-rate are inversely proportional to particle size, a significant decrease
in analysis time can be achieved while maintaining or enhancing chromatographic performance.3,4 However, one major constraint remains: the significant backpressure generated by small particles in optimal flow-rate conditions.
This approach is known as UPLC (ultra performance liquid chromatography) or ultra high pressure liquid chromatography (UHPLC),
according to the system provider. Numerous applications can be found in the literature with column lengths usually ranging
from 50–150 mm5–8 and, less frequently, with shorter column lengths.9
In the pharmaceutical industry, the quality control (QC) of a formulation remains relatively simple because the number of
active compounds, excipients and impurities is generally limited. As mentioned in various Pharmacopoeia, the separation is often performed with a conventional HPLC column (i.e., 150–250 mm in length) packed with 5 μm particles.10 However, there is a need to both control a large number of samples every day and reduce the response time delivery. Therefore,
the use of short columns packed with sub-2μm particles is of the utmost interest.
Thanks to the simple matrix nature and the low number of analytes, a chromatographic efficiency lower than 5000 plates is
often sufficient to perform the quality control of pharmaceutical drugs. Consequently, a 10 mm column packed with 1.9 μm was
evaluated to increase the throughput, without compromising the analytical performance. To our knowledge, the use of such short
columns packed with sub-2 μm particles has never been reported before. In the first part of this study, the compatibility
of these columns in pharmaceutical analysis is highlighted and chromatographic performance assessed on the basis of Van Deemter
curves and pressure plots. Then, these supports were used for the QC of three pharmaceutical formulations including local
anaesthetic, mydriatic and anti-hypertensive agent. Qualitative and quantitative performance was evaluated and methods validated
following regular guidelines (ICH). Experiment
Chemicals: Butylparaben was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Standards of bupivacaine HCl and atropine sulphate were
kindly provided by Sintetica SA (Mendrisio, Switzerland), while clonidine was purchased from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). Degradation
products, namely tropic acid and 2,6-dimethylaniline were both supplied by Fluka.
Injectable solution of clonidine 0.6 mg/mL was kindly provided by the "Pharmacie Interhospitaličre de la Côtequot; (Morges,
Switzerland). Bupivacaďne 0.5% and rapidocaďne 0.5% were obtained from Sintetica SA. Atropine 0.5 mg/mL was purchased from
Amino AG (Neuenhof, Switzerland).
Acetonitrile was of HPLC gradient grade from Panreac Quimica (Barcelona, Spain). Water was obtained from a Milli-Q Waters
Purification System from Millipore (Bedford, Massachusetts, USA). Phosphate buffers 50 mM at pH 7.0 and 7.4 were prepared
with an adapted quantity of anhydrous di-potassium hydrogen phosphate and potassium dihydrogen phosphate from Fluka. Buffer
solutions were prepared using the Phoebus software 1.0 from Analis (Namur, Belgium) and pH measured with a Metrohm pH meter
(Herisau, Switzerland).
Equipment: Chromatographic experiments were performed on Waters Acquity UPLC system (Milford, Massachusetts, USA). This instrument included
a binary solvent manager with a maximum flow-rate of 2 mL/min, an autosampler with an injection loop volume of 2 μL (1 μL
was injected in partial loop mode), a UV/vis programmable detector, a column manager with an oven (set at 30 şC). For all
separations, the UV detector time constant was set at 25 ms and the data sampling rate at 80 Hz.