The possibility of gas chromatography (GC) was first mentioned in 1941, in the famous paper by A.J.P. Martin and R.L.M. Synge.
When dealing with liquid-liquid partition chromatography, they predicted that
 Leslie S. Ettre
|
. . . the mobile phase need not be a liquid but may be a vapour. . . . Very refined separations of volatile substances should
therefore be possible in a column in which permanent gas is made to flow over gel impregnated with a nonvolatile solvent.
(1)However, at that time, nobody picked up this suggestion and it was 10 years until Martin, now with A.T. James, demonstrated
the possibility of gas-liquid partition chromatography (2,3). They worked in the biochemical field and demonstrated the application
of the technique by separating and quantitatively determining the components of a C1-C12 fatty acid mixture. The importance of GC was recognized almost immediately by petroleum and petrochemical laboratories, which
faced the daily challenge of analyzing complex hydrocarbon mixtures. However, the basic difference between liquid chromatography
(LC) and GC became apparent: while classical LC could be carried out in the laboratory by practically everybody using the
usual laboratory set-ups, GC required components that were not among the standard laboratory equipment of the time. Companies
with large research laboratories usually had mechanical shops capable of constructing the required sophisticated systems.
Indeed, the first gas chromatographs were built by the major petrochemical laboratories such as Shell or British Petroleum;
however, smaller laboratories did not have the means to construct and build their own systems. Therefore, it soon became obvious
that the immense potential of GC could only be fully exploited if proper instruments became available.
Birth of an Industry The years following World War II saw the birth of the scientific instrument industry. The first real "instruments" developed
and built were infrared spectrophotometers, but at that time, these were used only in a limited number of laboratories, and
their operation and use required special skills. The gas chromatographs represented the first truly automated, complex analytical
instruments that did not need specially skilled scientists for their operation and could be used by practically every laboratory.
Thus, it is not surprising that the early availability of mass-produced gas chromatographs had a major role in the rapid expansion
of the technique and its use. At the same time, this new industrial branch greatly benefited from the growing demand for this
instrument. We might even say that some kind of symbiosis existed between GC and the scientific instrument industry: the evolution
of the former could not have happened without the involvement of the latter. A number of companies prominent today in the
scientific instrumentation field started as small companies founded by some enterprising chemists starting to build gas chromatographs
for the analytical chemists. A couple of British companies (Griffin & George, London, UK, and Metropolitan Vickers Electrical Co., Manchester, UK) tried
to provide gas chromatographs soon after the publication of James and Martin's paper. However, they did not have the resources
for more fundamental development work, and their instruments were not much different from a self-constructed laboratory set-up.
The field soon was taken over by American companies, which gained experience in electronics and optics and in producing high-precision
systems to fulfill the need of the Allied military during World War II. The two companies introducing gas chromatographs almost
simultaneously in the spring of 1955 (three years after the publication of James and Martin) were the Burrell Corporation
(Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) and the Perkin-Elmer Corporation (Norwalk, Connecticut).
The Burrell Instruments Burrell Technical Supply Corporation was founded after World War I to supply gas analysis equipment. In 1943, it introduced
a system for the determination of the components of natural gas by selective adsorption-desorption. This was the so-called
Turner-Burrell Adsorption Fractionator and was based upon the work of Nelson C. Turner (4,5). It was a fairly complicated,
floor-standing machine, and its use was very tedious: one analysis took at least 8 h and required a 2-4 L gas sample. In subsequent
years, the instrument was simplified somewhat, reducing analysis time to 1-3 h: the result was the so-called Fracton, introduced
in 1953 (6).